WEKO3
アイテム
〈論文〉地域分権に対する行政の関与のあり方に関する考察
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/13437
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/13437bc222d69-5140-4dbe-bc50-1f9ca9ca087a
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
AA1253453X-20110825-0035.pdf (1.1 MB)
|
|
| Item type | ☆紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2011-09-06 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 〈論文〉地域分権に対する行政の関与のあり方に関する考察 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | A study on municipal concernment in regional decentralization | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 著者 |
久, 隆浩
× 久, 隆浩
|
|||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 著者(英) | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 値 | HISA, Takahiro | |||||||||
| 著者 所属 | ||||||||||
| 値 | 近畿大学総合社会学部 環境系専攻; 教授 | |||||||||
| 著者所属(翻訳) | ||||||||||
| 値 | Kinki University | |||||||||
| 版 | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| 出版者 名前 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 近畿大学総合社会学部 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
近畿大学総合社会学部紀要：総社る en : Applied sociology research review Kinki University : Social 巻 1, 号 1, p. 35-42, 発行日 2011-08-01 |
|||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | [Abstract] This paper considers the issue of the decentralization of power that is being implemented in various communities in recent years, and the ideal direction to be taken. It has been pointed out that the current system was created without a clear purpose, meaning, and a legal location for the decentralization of power. Moreover, it seems that residents' concerns have not been taken into account. Decentralization of power in a community involves handing over authority and fiscal resources by the administration, and if the community is not active in this process, it becomes meaningless. It might be important to hand over fiscal resources to the community first as an inclusive grant, and to give the community greater autonomy and power to decide the purpose of expenditure on a project. It is also considered necessary to implement such decentralization under the assumption that such community autonomy is a basic step; for example, the system is introduced after residents experience the network activity that mutual dialog creates, and understand the necessity and the possibility of such decentralization. | |||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||
