WEKO3
アイテム
<論文>保育・幼児教育における評価制度の現状
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/11694
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/11694b7caa641-9d2e-415d-8c2d-f72ccf42277c
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
AN10297606-20101200-0037.pdf (712.4 kB)
|
|
| Item type | ☆紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2012-04-23 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | <論文>保育・幼児教育における評価制度の現状 | |||||||||
| その他（別言語等）のタイトル | ||||||||||
| その他のタイトル | <THESIS>Current State of Evaluation System of Early Childhood Education in Japan | |||||||||
| 著者 |
垂見, 直樹
× 垂見, 直樹
|
|||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題 | evaluation system, quality of early childhood education, accountability | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 著者(英) | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 値 | Tarumi, Naoki | |||||||||
| 著者 所属 | ||||||||||
| 値 | 近畿大学九州短期大学保育科（保育内容総論 言葉） | |||||||||
| 著者所属(翻訳) | ||||||||||
| 値 | Kyushu Junior College of Kinki University Early Childhood Education Course | |||||||||
| 版 | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| 出版者 名前 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 近畿大学九州短期大学 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
近畿大学九州短期大学研究紀要 en : Research bulletin of Kyushu Junior College of Kinki University 巻 40, p. 37-46, 発行日 2010-12-01 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09164383 | |||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | [Abstract] The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the state of today's evaluation system for early childhood education in Japan. Early childhood education in Japan includes kindergartens controlled by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and day-care centers as a service of child welfare controlled by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Regardless of the difference in administration, each evaluation system has differences and similarities in idea and purpose. The purposes of ‘improvement of the quality of education’and ‘accountability to parents’ are the similarities while on the other hand, the method for evaluation is different. Both systems are supported by the‘right’ idea of ‘improvement the quality of early childhood education’ or ‘accountability to parents’. But in today's trend of structural reform in early childhood education, such an evaluation system could be an obstacle for the people working in the field. It is desirable to practice evaluation appropriate to them and to the children's benefit. [ | |||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||
