Guidelines for Mycotoxin Tolerances in Differnt Countries

Pohland,  A.E.

WEKO3

lat lon distance

[[sub_check.contents]]

[[sub_radio.contents]]

Field does not validate

[[sub_attr.contents]]　

インデックスツリー

アイテム

Guidelines for Mycotoxin Tolerances in Differnt Countries

https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/9866

Item type

☆紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)

公開日

2011-11-22

タイトル

Guidelines for Mycotoxin Tolerances in Differnt Countries

著者

Pohland, A.E.

言語

eng

資源タイプ

資源タイプ識別子

http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501

資源タイプ

departmental bulletin paper

アクセス権

metadata only access

アクセス権URI

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb

著者所属

値

Joint Institute for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration

出版者名前

出版者

近畿大学農学総合研究所

書誌情報

近畿大学農学総合研究所報告
en : Bulletin of the Institute for Comprehensive Agricultural Sciences, Kinki University

号 8, p. 47-53, 発行日 2000-03-01

ISSN

収録物識別子タイプ

ISSN

収録物識別子

09193022

抄録

内容記述タイプ

Abstract

内容記述

[Synopsis] The deleterious effects of mycotoxins on human health have been known for centuries. The challenge to society is now, as it has been in the past, how to control exposure to mycotoxins. A major part of the activity is concerned with how to judge the relative risk associated with such exposure. Having conducted such an exercise, risk management decisions are made which, in the past have been based primarily on economic considerations. This paper summarizes the effort made, internationally, to control exposure to the mycotoxins, with emphasis on the approach taken in the US. A review of these efforts reveals clearly the differing approaches taken by various counties in regulating mycotoxins. In general, for economic reasons, exporting countries tend to set higher regulatory levels than importing counties, with the European countries being most restrictive. In most cases, a scientific rationale for setting a particular level is not apparent. Setting a regulatory level is of value only if enforcement is contemplated. Enforcement requires the development of defensible sampling plans, as well as access to validated analytical methods and certified reference materials. In recent years there has been a clear trend toward harmonization of regulatory levels and methods, as well as certification of laboratories and analysts engaged in the enforcement of such levels.

戻る

views

See details