WEKO3
アイテム
Between Precaution and Prevention: Scientific Uncertainty and Implementation of the Precautionary Principle
https://doi.org/10.15100/00023613
https://doi.org/10.15100/00023613be866c9f-1883-49c1-ab99-a0d5669191fb
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
AN10144398-20230331-0067.pdf (889.8 kB)
|
|
| Item type | ☆紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-03-29 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Between Precaution and Prevention: Scientific Uncertainty and Implementation of the Precautionary Principle | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 著者 |
NISHITANI, Hitoshi
× NISHITANI, Hitoshi
|
|||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15100/00023613 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 著者 所属 | ||||||||||
| 値 | 近畿大学法学部法律学科; 准教授 | |||||||||
| 著者所属(翻訳) | ||||||||||
| 値 | Kindai University | |||||||||
| 版 | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | NA | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43 | |||||||||
| 出版者 名前 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 近畿大学法学会 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
近畿大學法學 en : Kinkidaigaku hogaku: Kindai University Law Review 巻 70, 号 2.3.4, p. 67-120, 発行日 2023-03-31 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09164537 | |||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | [Abstract] The cause and effect of risks like the destruction of the environment are global and multiplied now, and international efforts are needed to tackle new aspects of global environmental risks. However, to address the potential risks, international law should incorporate some degree of "uncertainty" and probable "risks" into the normative picture. The precautionary principle is an important instrument in tackling this "grey area" of uncertainty. Having its roots in German domestic law, this principle saw its widespread acceptance in international documents since the 1980s. The legal nature and status of the precautionary principle are under discussion among international legal scholars, while international courts and tribunals have been reluctant to apply this principle or to recognize its normative status explicitly. But this principle has a firm relationship with other existing norms and concepts for environmental protection, and its existence as a tool for initiating proactive measures in the face of uncertain risk is valuable. Although the precautionary principle shares a common continuum of timeframe with the principle of prevention, the dividing line between these two principles is rather vague. A continuous assessment as a part of risk management becomes necessary for both principles to operate effectively. It is for the decision-makers to draw the line, but this by no means leaves them in a free-hand position: prudent and cautious decision-making should be made in the face of scientific uncertainty for the effective implementation of the precautionary principle. | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 論説 Articles | |||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||
