WEKO3
アイテム
強行規範に基づく拒否権の法的制限に関する一考察――J. Trahan の議論を中心に――
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/22889
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/22889576dd0e6-a760-474e-b736-59ac4917e590
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Item type | ☆紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2022-07-08 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 強行規範に基づく拒否権の法的制限に関する一考察――J. Trahan の議論を中心に―― | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | <Research Articles> The Relationship between the Veto and Jus Cogens in Mass Atrocity Situations | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 著者 |
瀬岡, 直
× 瀬岡, 直
|
|||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題 | 拒否権, 強行規範, 人道的介入, 保護する責任 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 著者(英) | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 値 | Seoka, Nao | |||||||||
| 著者 所属 | ||||||||||
| 値 | International Law, Faculty of International Studies, Kindai University; Associate Professor | |||||||||
| 版 | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | NA | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43 | |||||||||
| 出版者 名前 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Faculty of International Studies Kindai University | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
Journal of International Studies 号 7, p. 17-32, 発行日 2022-06 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 24322938 | |||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | [ABSTRACT] The exercise of the veto power by the permanent members in the UN Security Council in cases that involve human rights violations, such as in Syria since 2011, has prompted an unprecedented number of the UN member states to call for the voluntary veto restraint. Through analyses of the veto power, some scholars have argued for the limits of the veto power, largely based on the law as it should be (de lege ferenda). In Existing Legal Limits to Security Council Veto Power in the Face of Atrocity Crimes, Jennifer Trahan, however, made a striking argument that the use or the threat of use of the veto to block measures aimed to prevent or punish jus cogens violations, that are atrocity crimes, falls outside the proper exercise of the veto power under the existing law (lex lata). Critically examining her study, the paper argues that the use or the threat of use of the veto in mass atrocities is, contrary to Trahan’s argument, not subordinate to Article 53 of the Vienna Convention that states jus cogens is “a norm accepted and recognized by the international community of States as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted.” | |||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||