WEKO3
アイテム
「ている」の不思議
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/22261
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/22261e23c5911-9fa9-4b88-acff-cb3819734af0
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
AA12777724-20211100-0073.pdf (723.8 kB)
|
|
| Item type | ☆紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2022-01-19 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 「ている」の不思議 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 〈Articles〉A Wonder of TEIRU | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 著者 |
濱本, 秀樹
× 濱本, 秀樹
|
|||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題 | present progressive form, simple present form, Japanese TEIRU form, cognitive ground, cognitive linguistics, Hawaii Creole English, bio programming | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 著者(英) | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 値 | Hamamoto, Hideki | |||||||||
| 著者 所属 | ||||||||||
| 値 | Emeritus Linguistics,Kindai University; Professor | |||||||||
| 版 | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | NA | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43 | |||||||||
| 出版者 名前 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Faculty of International Studies Kindai University | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
Journal of International Studies 号 6, p. 73-85, 発行日 2021-11 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 24322938 | |||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | [Abstract] In Japanese, the progress of a movement in front of us cannot be described in the present tense, but the "TEIRU" form, that is, the present progressive tense, is used. English, Chinese, Mongolian also use a format similar to the Japanese "TEIRU" to describe progressive movements. We will call these languages Class A. The progressive forms of Class A languages are almost the same, and this cannot be a mere coincidence. German, French, and Scandinavian, on the other hand, do not use the present progressive tense to describe an ongoing movement but express it in the present tense. Let's call these languages class C. Also, in Italian, the present tense and the present progressive tense are acceptable for expressing the ongoing progression. This will be called class B. This grammatical form, which seems to be simple, seems to hide a big secret. Why such significant differences exist between languages is a very interesting question. There are two themes in this treatise. The first theme is searching for common cognitive ground in the present progressive tense and finding out why the present progressive tense is similar in all languages with this form, namely class A. Speakers of these Class A languages have a common cognitive basis, which seems to be the basis for the similarity of this grammatical form. Despite the existence of this common base, there is a common time recognition that the progress of the movement in front of the eyes must be described in the present tense in class C. The conflict between Class A and Class C seems to be related to the difference in the perception of the present tense. The second theme concerns this difference in the perception of the present tense. In other words, speakers of Class A language seem to limit the present tense to the time of the speech, while speakers of C languages seem to grasp the present tense, not as a tense but as an epistemic modality. | |||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||
