{"created":"2023-06-20T16:49:48.871698+00:00","id":22116,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"10f980bb-6548-4081-8e1c-56e12e8eeda5"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"22116","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"22116"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp:00022116","sets":["14:2667:4710"]},"author_link":["43383"],"control_number":"22116","item_8_biblio_info_21":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2021","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"5","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"科学研究費助成事業研究成果報告書 (2020)"}]}]},"item_8_description_25":{"attribute_name":"リンクURL","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-18K01402/","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_8_description_33":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"研究成果の概要（和文）：本研究は、胎児が母胎内または母体外で出生前治療を受けたケースをもとに、出生前治療を受けた胎児に私法上の権利主体性が肯定される余地があるのかについて、米国法及び英国法との比較研究を実施した。本研究は、胎児の権利主体性については、米国では人工妊娠中絶の可否との関連で、英国ではパブリックポリシーと人権との関連で研究が蓄積されてきたことを明らかにした。また、本研究は、日本民法3条1項の見出し（制定時の「私権の享有」から「権利能力」に改正）に着目し、天賦人権思想に基けば、同条項は権利能力の帰属主体となるのは出生と解さざるを得ないが、出生前治療との関係では解釈を拡張しなければならないことを明らかにした。研究成果の概要（英文）：The purpose of this study is to uncover whether there is the possibility of a fetus is granted private rights, where a fetus has received prenatal treatments in or out of the mother's body. I engaged in my study by the method of comparative study with common law in UK and USA. I have revealed the new facts that this issue was discussed in connection with abortion in USA, and this issue was discussed in connection with public policy and human rights in UK. And, I have focused on a heading of a provision of Article 3(1) of Japanese Code Civil - It was \"Enjoyment of Private Rights\" at the time of enactment, but was amended to \"Capacity to Hold Rights\" in 2006, in order to test the possibility of a fetus is granted private rights. I have pointed out that there was a misreading of a provision of Article 3(1) of Japanese Civil Code in the most of academic theories and judicial precedents. I have pointed out that the reason of misreading was due to the theory of natural human rights.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_8_description_36":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"研究種目：基盤研究(C);  研究期間：2018～2020;   課題番号：18K01402;   研究分野：民法・医事法;   科研費の分科・細目：","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_8_description_37":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ(WEKO2)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Research Paper","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_8_description_41":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_8_publisher_14":{"attribute_name":"出版者 名前","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"近畿大学"}]},"item_8_text_10":{"attribute_name":"著者 役割","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"研究代表者"}]},"item_8_text_7":{"attribute_name":"著者(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"Hasegawa, Yoshihito"}]},"item_8_text_8":{"attribute_name":"著者 所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"近畿大学法学部; 教授"}]},"item_8_text_9":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(翻訳)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Kindai University"}]},"item_8_version_type_12":{"attribute_name":"版","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43","subitem_version_type":"NA"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"長谷川, 義仁"},{"creatorName":"ハセガワ, ヨシヒト","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{},{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2021-11-08"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"18K01402seika.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"173.8 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"18K01402seika.pdf","url":"https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/22116/files/18K01402seika.pdf"},"version_id":"94fbc099-c341-49b7-be65-8c6fc847206b"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"出生前治療","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"胎児","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"私権の享有","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"権利能力","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"権利主体","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"research report","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws"}]},"item_title":"出生前（胎児）治療における胎児の私法上の権利主体性に関する研究","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"出生前（胎児）治療における胎児の私法上の権利主体性に関する研究","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Study on the possibility of a fetus who receive prenatal treatments enjoy the personal rights.","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"8","owner":"3","path":["4710"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2021-11-08"},"publish_date":"2021-11-08","publish_status":"0","recid":"22116","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["出生前（胎児）治療における胎児の私法上の権利主体性に関する研究"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-08-02T06:41:49.420313+00:00"}