@article{oai:kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000064,
 author = {石井, 隆之 and Ishii, Takayuki},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {生駒経済論叢, Ikoma Journal of Economics},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {[概要]日本語と英語の双方に多重WH構文(疑問詞が複数生じる文)が存在するが，この文におけるWH句は，LF(論理形式)部門で，WHが移動して認可されるものと，一般に考えられている。本稿では，WH句の認可条件に，WH句のLF移動が関わっていないと考え，CP主要部照合という照合理論を提案する。LF内で主節のCP主要部が，WH句をm統御していることが最低条件で，WH句は認可されると考える。素性の一致と照合数の満足により，WH句は完全に認可され，全体の文に正しい解釈が与えられる。主節と従節のどちらに，WH句がどれだけ生じるのかという観点で，構文を分類し，それぞれCP主要部照合を試みた。結果として，日本語において，「助詞『か』がS構造上での移動では島にならないのに，LF移動で島になる」という矛盾を解決するなど，CP照合の優位性を示すことになった。, It is generally believed that WH-phrases contained in the multi-WH questions seen both in Japanese and English are licensed by the syntactic process of the phrases moving to the representation level of the logical form (LF). In this paper, we will propose a checking theory named CP-head checking by regarding licensing requirements as independent of LF movements of WH-phrases. Under the minimum condition of the matrix CP head m-commanding WH-phrases, they are licensed. Correct grammatical interpretation of the WH-phrases will be obtained through feature agreements and satisfaction of the number of CP-checked WH-phrases, the whole of which process leads to the overall semantic justification of the whole sentence. We have given CP-head checking to WH questions classified in terms of how many WH-phrases are generated in which clause (matrix or subordinate). As a result we successfully solved some of the so-far unsolved problems like the inconsistency often pointed out in Japanese WH-questions: The particle "ka" functions as an island in LF movement though not an island in the movement within S-structure. The CP checking has been found workable enough to give more principled explanation to unsolved problem areas than other similar theories.},
 pages = {1--19},
 title = {多重WH構文の統語現象に関する一考察},
 volume = {3},
 year = {2005}
}