WEKO3
アイテム
〈Articles〉Suspending Logic: A Linguistic Exercise. Part I - Dimensions and Levels of Analysis, with Some Contrastive Considerations
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/19904
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/199047e3b27eb-dc7c-4888-922b-5efa0886616f
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
AA12777724-20181100-0021.pdf (750.3 kB)
|
|
| Item type | ☆紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2019-01-30 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | 〈Articles〉Suspending Logic: A Linguistic Exercise. Part I - Dimensions and Levels of Analysis, with Some Contrastive Considerations | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 著者 |
Tămâianu-Morita, Emma
× Tămâianu-Morita, Emma
|
|||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題 | Linguistic conceptualization, Textual meaning, Congruence, Correctness, Adequacy (Appropriateness) | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
| 著者 所属 | ||||||||
| 値 | Faculty of International Studies, Kindai University; Professor | |||||||
| 版 | ||||||||
| 出版タイプ | NA | |||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43 | |||||||
| 出版者 名前 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | Faculty of International Studies, Kindai University | |||||||
| 書誌情報 |
Journal of International Studies 号 3, p. 21-44, 発行日 2018-11 |
|||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 24322938 | |||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
| 内容記述 | [Abstract] Japanese is sometimes described as more ‘illogical’, or at least more ‘vague’, from the standpoint of the referential function, than English and other European languages. In counterpoise, fostering the students’ logical thinking abilities is often put forward as one of the educational goals of teaching English in Japan. This paper examines critically some of the ground tenets that underlie these two complementary views, adopting a contrastive perspective, with illustrations selected mainly from Japanese, English and Romanian texts. Starting from a distinction proposed by E. Coseriu (1957) between two radically different acceptations of «logic» in relation to language, the present paper explores the functional autonomy of the judgments of idiomatic correctness and textual adequacy (appropriateness) from the judgments of congruence and logical coherence, in light of a general principle of suspendability of non-conformity evaluations from more specific levels to more general levels of language organization and linguistic competence. Part I focuses on instances where the judgments of incongruence are suspended through the semantic organization of particular languages as historically-constituted traditions of speech. | |||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||
