WEKO3
アイテム
〈Articles〉因果関係と意味論
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/19903
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/19903e03aae1c-f144-4ee0-ab63-5b0b289542af
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
AA12777724-20181100-0001.pdf (380.4 kB)
|
|
| Item type | ☆紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2019-01-30 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 〈Articles〉因果関係と意味論 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 〈Articles〉Theories of Causation and their Implications to Semantics | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 著者 |
濱本, 秀樹
× 濱本, 秀樹
|
|||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題 | 恒常的継起性因果関係理論, 反実仮想的因果関係論, 確率論的因果関係論, タイプ的因果性, トークン的因果性, 結果構文 regularity theory of causation, counterfactual theory of causation, probabilistic theory of causation, type causality, token causality, resultative constructions |
|||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 著者(英) | ||||||||||
| en | ||||||||||
| Hamamoto, Hideki | ||||||||||
| 著者 所属 | ||||||||||
| Faculty of International Studies, Kindai University; Professor | ||||||||||
| 版 | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | NA | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43 | |||||||||
| 出版者 名前 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Faculty of International Studies, Kindai University | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
Journal of International Studies 号 3, p. 1-19, 発行日 2018-11 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 24322938 | |||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | [Abstract] The commonly accepted view on causation is that it brings something about or makes something happen, such as when a stone smashes a window. But how precisely can we grasp what it is for one thing to cause another? There are a number of views on this problem. Some philosophers think the basis of causation is regularity. Others claim that the existence of the effect depends counterfactually on the existence of the cause. Still others argue that causality is defined in such a way that causes raise the probability of their effects. Although we have seen several attempts to provide such an account, it is still safe to say that none has yet succeeded. One can suspect that there is no univocal analysis of the concept of causation. This research, standing on the pluralism of causations, discusses implications of the causal theories to elucidation of semantic features of linguistic constructions, particularly resultative constructions of Japanese and English. | |||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||
