@article{oai:kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp:00019092,
 author = {石井, 聡},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {生駒経済論叢, Ikoma Journal of Economics},
 month = {Nov},
 note = {[要旨]本稿の課題は，国際労働機関（ILO）創設期における政・労・使三者構成のなかでのILO の議論やそこでの妥協はどのようなものだったのか，国際労働規制の影響力はどの程度のものであったのかについて，1919年の ILO 第１号条約（「工業的企業に於ける労働時間を1日8時間且1週48時間に制限する条約」）を事例として検討することにある。今回は，連載の3回目であり，第1回 ILO 総会の労働時間特別委員会および総会の関連議論の後半部分を検討している。そこでは，1日8時間労働原則を主張する労働者代表と，週48時間労働制を目指す使用者代表が激しく対立したが，「１日8時間且週48時間」という表現を用いつつ，実質内容は週48時間労働制とする政府代表の提案によって妥協が得られ，第1号条約は可決された。
[Abstract] This article focusing on the problem presented considers the case of the first Convention of the ILO in 1919 (Hours of Work) where a treaty was examined, what were the arguments of the ILO on the inside of the tripartite structure and the compromises. Also considered was to what degree there was an influence on international labor standards. This article also consists of a third part related to serialization and a part where we consider the related arguments for working hours by the Commission on Hours of Labor and the first International Labor Conference held in Washington. There were intense conflicts between worker’s representatives who insisted on the principle of an 8-hour work day and employer’s representatives who wanted a 48-hour work week. Government delegates, however, proposed the compromise that made a labor system with a 48-hour week. This compromise also contained substantial content and used the expression“ The working hours of employed persons shall not exceed 8 hours a day and 48 hours a week”. As a result, the first International Labor Conference approved the first Convention., application/pdf},
 pages = {1--19},
 title = {〈論文〉ILO における国際社会政策の歴史－1919年労働時間条約を巡って－(3)},
 volume = {15},
 year = {2017},
 yomi = {イシイ, サトシ}
}