WEKO3
アイテム
〈Refereed Papers〉The Necessity to Advance Disclosing Fair Value by the Hierarchy: Evidence from Literature Review about Fair Value Hierarchy Information
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/17795
https://kindai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/17795f03ebc34-2613-479e-b2a3-70be7f520be8
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
AN10437975-20160325-0149.pdf (1.2 MB)
|
|
| Item type | ☆紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2016-08-26 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | 〈Refereed Papers〉The Necessity to Advance Disclosing Fair Value by the Hierarchy: Evidence from Literature Review about Fair Value Hierarchy Information | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 著者 |
ZHANG, JIAO
× ZHANG, JIAO
|
|||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題 | fair value, value relevance, fair value hierarchy, illiquid market, inputs | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
| 著者 所属 | ||||||||
| 値 | 近畿大学大学院商学研究科; 博士後期課程1年 | |||||||
| 著者所属(翻訳) | ||||||||
| 値 | Kindai University | |||||||
| 版 | ||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||
| 出版者 名前 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | 近畿大学商経学会 | |||||||
| 書誌情報 |
商経学叢 en : Shokei-gakuso: Journal of Business Studies 巻 62, 号 3, p. 149-172, 発行日 2016-03-25 |
|||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 04502825 | |||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
| 内容記述 | [Abstract] This paper aims to discuss the necessity to advance disclosing fair value by hierarchy in Japan by reviewing the literature about fair value hierarchy information in the U.S. In Japan, ASBJ published the Exposure Draft "Accounting Standards on Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure" in 2010 which specifies that the fair value should be reported by hierarchy. However, it has not published as formal standard until March 2016. Furthermore, some commenters suggested that the hierarchy and estimation process of fair value should not be disclosed because of the heavy cost. However, by surveying the empirical results, it is evident that the fair value from market (Level １) is significant different from the fair value based on manager’s valuation (Level ３). For example, those empirical results suggest that valuation multiples on mark-to-model estimates are generally lower than those based on unadjusted market prices. Further, by the literature review, it is even known that there is some evidence revealing that managers appear to manipulate the fair value estimates of Level ３. Furthermore, these results show that fair value assets, especially those measured using Level ２ and Level ３ inputs, are negatively related to analysts’ information quality and positively related to forecast dispersion and absolute forecast errors. Because of these differences, disclosing the fair value without the hierarchy will make the fair value less transparent and less reliable. Overall, from the views of decision usefulness and avoiding the discretionary behavior by manager, this paper concludes as follows. First, it should be accelerated to practice the ASBJ Exposure Draft "Accounting Standards on Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure." Second, objecting to the comments suggesting unnecessity of the disclosure of hierarchy and estimation process of fair value, this paper concludes the disclosure is indispensable. | |||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||
